WebbEditor’s Decision: Reconsider after major revisions (16 March 2024) by James Dyke We agree that the increased length of the paper detracts from its readability. We note that the increased length resulted from a very long list of requested explanations and clarifications by … Webb8 jan. 2014 · First, we would like to say thank you to the reviewers for the useful comments to improve the paper. We have addressed all the comments as explained below. REVIEWER 1. “Section 3 is too long”. We have addressed this comment by deleting a few lines at the end of the second paragraph that were not necessary for understanding the algorithm.
别被论文大修吓到!除了“reject”其他都算好消息 - 知乎
Webb9 dec. 2024 · There are of course some problems, which are genuinely difficult to solve. 3a) your paper nonetheless has important results: then highlight that further research is necessary and your result is a ... WebbEditor’s Decision: Reconsider after major revisions (16 March 2024) by James Dyke We agree that the increased length of the paper detracts from its readability. We note that … city of rockingham suburbs
Associate Editor Decision: Reconsider after major revisions
Webb9 jan. 2024 · Often the peer review process progresses smoothly through the steps: A new manuscript is submitted; appropriate reviewers are identified, invited and promptly accept; they provide a report that arrives on time recommending major revisions; the authors thoughtfully revise their manuscript to the satisfaction of the reviewers so that the … http://winet.ece.ufl.edu/tvt/associateeditors/majorrevisions.html WebbAssociate Editor Decision: Reconsider after major revisions (02 Jul 2024) by Jens-Arne Subke Comments to the Author: Dear Drs Zha and Zhuang, Thank you for addressing referees concerns over the manuscript. I have reviewed your changes and have reason to request further changes before I’m able to finally accept this manuscript for publication. city of rockingham pet registration